AI Inspection

Structured findings,not paragraphs.

Upload an image, connect it to a product, batch, line and supplier, and receive validated, structured findings your team can review, confirm or reject.

A paragraph answer

“The jar may have a slightly irregular seal and the label looks maybe a bit off, so there could be an issue…”

A FoodVision AI finding ↓

Finding · FV-0142Review required
Finding
Seal irregularity
Category
Packaging
Severity
High
Confidence
82%
Observed
Visible gap along the lid edge on the centre unit.
Interpretation
Possible sealing fault. Not confirmed.
Next action
Re-inspect lot; check sealing station.
Limits
Image cannot show contamination; qualified review required.
ConfirmRejectFalse positive

Illustrative · sample content, not customer data

Upload → Validate → Analyze

Each image is checked for usability before analysis. Findings carry category, severity, confidence, observed evidence, interpretation, recommended action and stated limitations.

Evidence vs. interpretation

What is visibly observed is always kept separate from what the AI infers. Nothing is treated as a confirmed quality failure until an authorized reviewer confirms it.

Packaging & label inspection

Visible packaging damage, seal appearance, label position and legible text are examined where image quality allows.

  • Legal or regulatory label compliance is never claimed from an image
  • Unclear text is reported as unclear, not guessed

Your quality categories

Classification — acceptable, review required, defect detected, critical review — follows the standards your organization configures, with the reasoning shown.

FoodVision AI is decision support for qualified professionals. A photograph cannot establish pathogens, toxins, chemical contamination, allergens or regulatory compliance; where evidence is insufficient the product says additional testing or qualified human review is required.